|
Family Theories
Direct Human Services by Sarah Bradley - This page
by Tom Crofoot
|
Model of Family Therapy
|
View of Normal Family Functioning
|
View of Dysfunction or Symptoms
|
Goals of Therapy
|
PROBLEM-SOLVING
APPROACHES |
Structural
(Salvador Minuchin,
Harry Aponte) |
1. Generational hierarchy
with strong parental authority
3. Flexibility of system for:
a. Autonomy and inter- dependence
b. Continuity and adaptive restructuring to fix changing
internal and external demands |
No families are problem-free.
Symptoms result from current family structural imbalance:
1. Malfunctioning generational hierarchy, boundaries
2. Enmeshed or disengaged style.
3. Maladaptive reactions to changing demands (developmental,
environmental) |
Reorganize family structure:
1. Shift members relative positions to disrupt malfunctioning
pattern and strengthen parental hierarchy.
2. Reinforce clear, flexible boundaries.
3. Mobilize more adaptive alternative patterns. |
Strategic
or Systemic |
(Jay Haley & Chloe
Madanes)
(Luigui Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin, Lynn Hoffman Milan group) |
1. Flexibility
2. Large behavioral repertoire for:
a. Problem resolution
b. Life-cycle passage |
Symptom is a communicative
act embedded in interaction pattern.
Multiple origins of problems; symptoms maintained by:
1. Unsuccessful problem-solving attempts.
2. Impasse at life-cycle transition.
3. Rigid view, paucity of alternatives. |
1. Resolve presenting
problem; specific pragmatic objectives.
2. Interrupt rigid feedback cycle: change symptom-maintaining
sequence to new outcome
3. Shift perspective to enable more empowered position. |
|
Model of Family Therapy
|
View of Normal Family Functioning
|
View of Dysfunction or Symptoms
|
Goals of Therapy
|
SOCIAL
LEARNING THEORIES |
Resilience
(Froma Walsh,
Hamilton McCubbin) |
1. Wide range of family
types and established patterns.
2. Hardy
3. Coherent
4. Flexible
5. Resistance resources able and capable to manage stressors
and demands
6. In Balance |
1. Pileup of demands
and stressors
2. Maladjustment to stressors provokes crisis response
3. Existing family patterns and schemas are disrupted. |
Return family to balance
1. Increase family resources and social support with multisystem,
community based interventions.
2. Help family to find new appraisals of stressors and
demands and new problem solving and coping capacities
3. Explore family paradigms, sense of coherence and schemas |
Social Learning
Theory
(Gerald Patterson) |
1. Adaptive behavior
is rewarded; maladaptive behavior is not.
2. Exchange of benefits outweighs costs; reciprocity.
3. Communication and problem solving ability.
4. Flexibility |
Maladaptive, symptomatic
behavior reinforced by:
1. Family attention and reward.
2. Deficient exchanges (e.g., coercive, skewed).
3. Communication deficits |
Concrete observable behavioral
goals:
1. Change contingencies of social reinforcement.
2. Reward adaptive behavior, not maladaptive.
3. Communication, problem-solving skills training |
|
PSYCHO-EDUCATIONAL
|
(Anderson) |
Successful coping and mastery
of developmental challenges:
1. Caregiving in chronic illness
2. Tasks and skills in couples' relationships and family
life |
1. Stress / diathesis
in
biologically based disorders
2. Normative and non-normative stresses (e.g. in couples'
relationships, parenting, remarriage, adverse life events). |
Information, coping skills,
and social support for:
1. Family management of chronic illness.
2. Stress and stigma reduction.
3. Mastery of family adaptational challenges. |
Adapted from Walsh,
F. (1993). Conceptualization of normal family processes. In
F. Walsh (Ed.). Normal family process (2nd ed., p.
45) . New York: Guilford Press.
Adapted from McCubbin,
H. I., Thompson, E. A., Thompson, A. I., & Fromer, J. E. (1998)
. Resliency in Native American and immigrant families. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage. And Walsh, F. (1998) Strengthening
family resilience. New York: Guilford.
|
TRANSGENERATIONAL GROWTH APPROACHES
|
Psychodynamic/Contextual |
(Ivan
Boszormenyi-Nagy, Barbara Krasner) |
1. Parental personalities
and relationships well differentiated.
2. Relationship perceptions based on current realities, not
projections from the past.
3. Provide context of security, trust, nurturance for bonding,
and individuation |
Symptoms due to shared family
projection process stemming from unresolved conflicts, loyalty
issues, and losses in family of origin.
1. Scapegoating
2. Unconscious role assignment
3. Early trauma, inner conflict |
1. Insight and resolution
of family of origin conflicts and losses
2. Awareness of self and other family members.
3. Decrease family projection processes.
4. Relationship reconstruction and reunion
5. More empathic relating; expression and resolution of emotions. |
Communication/Experimental |
(Virginia
Satir
& Whitaker) |
1. High self-worth.
2. Clear, honest communication
3. Flexible, appropriate family rules and roles
4. Open, hopeful social links.
5. Evolutionary growth, change.
6. Pleasurable, playful interaction |
1. Symptoms are nonverbal
messages in reaction to current communication dysfunction in system.
2. Blocked conflict resolution.
3. Dysfunctional rules and roles |
1. Direct, clear communication
through immediate shared experience.
2. Catalyze exploration experimentation, spontaneity.
3. Genuine nondefensive relating
4. Honest communication of feelings and needs.
5. Constructive and flexible family rules and roles. |
Adapted from Walsh,
F. (1993). Conceptualization of normal family processes. In
F. Walsh (Ed.). Normal family process (2nd ed., p.
45) . New York: Guilford Press.
|
Model of Family Therapy
|
View of Normal Family Functioning
|
View of Dysfunction or Symptoms
|
Goals of Therapy
|
SOLUTION
BASED |
Solutions |
(Steve de
Shazer
& Insoo Kim Berg) |
1. See human life
as a constantly changing process.
2. Don't fix what isn't broke.
3. Do more of what works.
4. If something doesn't work, don't do it again, do something
different. |
1. Doesn't believe
problem exists when actually needing helping system
2. Lack of independence or sense of autonomy--e.g., presents
as innocent bystanders who have to endure difficulties others
inflict.
3. Strained relations with family of origin or support
systems |
Construct solutions rather
than dissolving problems.
1. Recognize pre-session change.
2. Find exceptions
a. Deliberate
b. Random
3. Negotiate goals
a. Set defined number of sessions -or-
b. Use "miracle question" |
Adapted from Berg,
J.K. (1994). Family based services: A solution-focused
approach. New York: W.W. Norton.
|
Model of Family Therapy
|
View of Normal Family Functioning
|
View of Dysfunction or Symptoms
|
Goals of Therapy
|
Narrative |
(Michael White) |
1. Families do the
best they can given the options available to them.
2. All families have personal and social strengths and
resources.
3. Families will make changes when change is understood
as beneficial and when the means for change are made available. |
1. Families "get
into trouble" when they see no other viable options than those
which are causing problems for themselves or others.
2. Alternative options are not available because of limitations
in resources or because stories or beliefs render certain options
inaccessible or invisible. |
1. Written and verbal
discourse with families acknowledges the validity of their stories
and experiences as told to us without judgment or interpretations
based on notions of right or wrong.
2. Written and verbal discourse with families seeks to
multiply the voices and stories told by others or the self, thereby
multiplying the range of choices and possibilities for change. |
Adapted from Sparks, Jacqueline (1993). Narrative
and family-based principles: An ethical approach to helping. Presentation. Contact
The Friends Program, Inc. 249 Pleasant St. Concord, New Hampshire,
03301-2509.
|
Model of Family Therapy
|
View of Normal Family Functioning
|
View of Dysfunction or Symptoms
|
Goals of Therapy
|
Feminist |
(Betty Carter,
Peggy Papp, Marianne Walters) |
1. Families are not
gender free or "neutral".
2. Role symmetry where each gender engages in both instrumental
and expressive tasks both work and nurturing.
3. Maturity is defined as autonomy with connectedness. |
1. Role complementarity: instrumental
tasks like earning money are male, and emotional tasks like nurturing
are female.
2. Organization of power is based on male hierarchy.
3. Autonomy and connectedness are split. Autonomy
(male) is valued with both power and emotional disconnectedness,
while women are assigned "dependency" with both the
emotional connectedness and powerlessness |
1. All interventions
need to take gender into account by recognizing the different socialization
processes of women and men.
2. Pay special attention to the way in which socialization
processes disadvantage women.
3. Recognize that each gender hears a different meaning
in the same clinical intervention and accordingly feels either
blamed or supported.
4. Change economic, social and legal institutions to support
changes that would enable women to work more outside of the home,
and men to work more inside by providing child-care, and giving
economic and social status to the work of child rearing. (personal
is political). |
Adapted from Walters,
M., Carter, B., Papp, P., Silverstein, O. (1988). Toward
a Feminist perspective in family therapy. In M. Walters, B.
Carter, P. Papp, O. Silverstein (Eds. ) . The
invisible web: Gender patterns in family relationships. New
York: The Guilford Press.
|
Model of Family Therapy
|
View of Normal Family Functioning
|
View of Dysfunction or Symptoms
|
Goals of Therapy
|
Family
Decision Making/Family Group Conference |
(Maori,
Buford, Hudson, Showell) |
1. Children are best
protected and nurtured when families are strong.
2. Families have strengths and can change.
3. Families deserve respect.
4. Families, relatives and communities are allies and resources.
5. Family strengths are what ultimately resolve issues of concern. It
is important to set up opportunities for families to show their
strengths.
6. The people who get most deeply impassioned about a particular
case of child abuse are the parents and relatives. |
1. Ignoring customs,
rituals and kinship networks increases problems rather than decreasing
them. |
1. Stregthen families.
2. Avoid out of home placements.
3. Return children from foster care.
4. Increase safety for children by encouraging and using
the resources and strengths of the families, friends, relatives
and communities themselves. |
Adapted from: Showell,
B. (1996) . Family unity meeting. Child welfare training
(1996-August). Unpublished presentation.
Wilcox, R. Smith,
D., Moore, J. Hewitt, A. Alan, G. Walker, H., Ropata, M., Monu,
L., and Featherstote, T. (1991) . Family decision making: Family
group conferences-Practitioners' views. Lower Hutt, New Zealand:
Publishing/Family Rights Group.
|